social network with over 500 million users have installed practices that are changing the way we interact socially, how to treat private and public, our idea of \u200b\u200b I , and even - theme of this writing, the way to bond with death. Inaugurates a metaphysics where he once considered "real " discussed in the interaction between virtual and non virtual.
Since the invention of Facebook in the year 2004 has very clear that the way social ties are having a "digital turn " . Of course, the brainchild of Mark Zuckerberg was not the first to play the game of virtual friendship. experiences now seem "moderate " , if not " overcome " , but sites like My Space Fotolog and to name the most famous in Latin America have preceded him. No But the immediate and collective virtual interaction between networks " friends " is a practice becomes a habit and making sizeable with the advent of Facebook.
This interactive virtual magma applicant in which we deal today, how death treats user? Facebook "We are proposing another way of relating to " death "? Or give us tools to deny ?
When the friend - Facebook dies
social networking sites on the Internet allow us to " see " on display the words of friendly people , its " thoughts " verbalized, but also its links, pictures and comments. What " likes " , the events I attend, the interest groups that has joined, among other things. As interactive viewers and even co-creators of our friend's profile on Facebook, we - if we do not have locked-add our own comments, tag photos and videos, write on your wall and above all: have all this available to our friend even when not connected to the site.
Now suppose that the user of Facebook has ceased to exist. What happens then to your virtual life ?
digital Cemetery
Facebook has a strategy to keep the system in the deceased users. This is creating a memorial page , which has a limited number of applications to preserve the memory of the deceased. This is effective in cases where relatives or friends died inform users and give evidence that the death occurred.
When notified that a user has died, Facebook gives you choices: either delete the profile, or keep it as a memorial . In this second case block sections and limited the use of your account (you can not add new friends, for example). Also revokes the statement listing the name in the search or use it to offer services for social interaction.
is a posthumous profile of activity. relatives It can write on the wall, upload photos, videos, to quote the late and comment. Access to these sites is private, limited to relatives.
Dead "live"
noteworthy case occurs when one user complaint died. This is where the account created in Facebook is able to survive its creator and extended in different interactions, indefinitely. A kind of new age immortality. And speaking of immortality, I remember Borges, Jorge Luis, and haiku No. 10 shown in the figure .
Today, I want to say something like: The Man Died, Facebook does not know, survives the user.
Unless the death report to " system" each of us is a live user, a potential consumer, an active page, a search engine data for different social advertising business.
But Is not this show continued the modus operandi what we call "culture " ? To wit: just as the works of countless men throughout history have been circulating in spite - or because - of the death of its creator, Facebook users posted their dies and leaves " profile" , textual and visual construction / digital at your Facebook friends. In that case, Facebook would be practiced only an exacerbation of the possibility of " significance" that brings rigged the cultural fact " post " . What befalls the creator of a user account when you die is that you can not split into virtual / no virtual, but has been confined to the virtual indefinitely. This also happens when an author dies, has always happened. Similar things happen with the book, published articles, films or videos in which they appear, the pictures.
organic We say: The bottle has been a germination and it matters little that the primitive bean is no longer in sight.
In this sense we are not our users. There is no identity between real self and the user is important because the latter is a vector of web activity.
* Many thanks to Sole Mendilarhazu Clo Orqueda and the input data that was very useful for this test.
0 comments:
Post a Comment